I see a newspaper reports of a meeting. And I see the weekly schedule and that meeting isn’t on the weekly schedule.
Here’s this week’s schedule (good thing its short, cuz I never got to the week ahead)
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
12:00 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ROOM 313 MMB
4:30 PM CDA HOUSING OPERATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE 8 STRAUBEL COURT, CONFERENCE ROOM
4:30 PM COMMON COUNCIL ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITTEE ROOM 108 CCB
5:15 PM UNIVERSITY AVENUE CORRIDOR PLANNING PROCESS RNA ADVISORY SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE PLAN 4340 TOKAY BOULEVARD STUDY ROOM B
6:00 PM COMMON COUNCIL – DISCUSSION, STAFF UPDATE ON HIGH SPEED RAIL PROJECT ROOM 201 CCB
6:30 PM COMMON COUNCIL ROOM 201 CCBWednesday, September 8, 2010
8:00 AM BOARD OF ASSESSORS ROOM 101 CCB
10:30 AM MINORITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ROOM LL-130 MMB
12:00 PM PERSONNEL BOARD ROOM 103A CCB
1:00 PM BOARD OF REVIEW ROOM 108 CCBThursday, September 9, 2010
12:00 PM EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION EMPLOYMENT COMMITTEE 525 JUNCTION ROAD
Here’s the article and it starts out like this:
Despite uncertainty about how it will be funded, an executive committee of the organization running the Overture Center voted Wednesday . . .
and the article has this time stamp:
Posted: Wednesday, September 8, 2010 10:08 pm
According to my e-mails, the agenda was posted on the Weekly Meeting Schedule at 12:30 p.m. or so on Tuesday, so I think it was ok for Wednesday.
But it wasn’t posted . . . its wasn’t there even when I refreshed my browser.
I saw it when I clicked on the Weekly Meeting Schedule link both now and this morning (and I think earlier, but I can’t be sure on that).
Also, of course, the official notice is on the clerk’s bulletin anyway, which I did not check on Tuesday.
Hmm, its clearly there now. But it wasn’t yesterday. And you’re, of course right, the official notice isn’t on the web, which is why I wasn’t sure if it was illegal or not. I didn’t go to the city-county building to confirm. Even if the notice was legally up there, 28 hours notice is not a good way for the Overture or the City to be doing business. And it is a disservice to the public.
I certainly won’t argue that it’s ideal, but I just didn’t get the impression was it was illegal/wrong.