So, here’s many of the big items, minus streets, parks, water utility, sewer utility, etc which will be in part II. Items of particular interest in red. BK comments in purple. Note all the new TIF districts and the $62 million to fix up the area around the train station . . . and $70 million to move the bus barn . . .
Energy Efficiency Improvements
This project continues to fund energy efficiency improvement for City buildings. For 2011, projects will continue the work done in 2010 including upgrading PW facilities with LED outdoor lighting, installation of industrial fans to destratify air for heat savings, air sealing and insulating various PW facilities. All of these projects yield a 5-7 year payback. Other funding is grant funding through Focus on Energy.
2011 – 220,500
2012 – 232,000
2013 – 245,000
2014 – 260,000
2015 – 275,000
2016 – 290,000
$20,000 from the state each year.
Justification = There are still many ways to reduce electrical and heating loads at various city buildings. If these investments are not made, the City will pay an additional amount for electrical and heating through the Operating Budget.
Development Services Center
This project is the major remodeling of the lower level of the Madison Municipal Building and a Development Services Center. The project includes a larger lobby, counter area and conference rooms, including furnishings and equipment for work stations for sixty-eight employees.
2011 – 180,000
2012 – 1,800,000
Justification = This project creates a physical space for the Development Services Center. If this is not included in the budget, the service that the physical space of a Development Services Center will not be provided to the business community.
This has been in the budget for years, think this is the year it will finally happen?
Let’s add this as we go along, how much is it going to cost us to redevelop the parking ramp and municipal building area for the train station and grand vision the mayor has for hotel and public market. It start here: $1,980,000.
Fairchild Building
Funding in 2011 is for repairs to the chimney and for additional tuck-pointing. A room on the southwest side of the building will be divided to provide additional space for Mall Concourse and the Police Property Room.
2011 – 200,000
Justification = The Fairchild Building needs to repair the chimney. Tuck-pointing is also needed. Finally, there is currently 4000 square feet of space that both Mall Concourse and the Madison Police Department would like to occupy. This funding will enable Facilities Management to divide the space to accommodate both users.
Council Chambers
The project is to remodel the Council Chambers Room 201 CCB. The project is estimated to cost $400,000 with the County and the City sharing the cost 50/50. The Plan Commission, ALRC, and Municipal Court also use this room. The project envisions a room that would be ADA compliant and have video screens so that the meeting participants and the public could view the presentations being deliberated. The project also will increase energy savings through improvements to the windows, which are single pane glass. This project includes $200,000 reauthorized from 2010.
2011- 200,000
Justification = Remodeling the CCB-201 Council Chambers is an important project because this room needs to become ADA compliant. In addition, it is currently difficult for meeting participants and the public to view presentations.
This has been in the budget for years, is there any guarantee it will finally happen?
Madison Municipal Building
This future project is to further remodel the MMB including window and HVAC replacement. This project would include some interior work on the 2nd floor and would also address the significant energy issues through incorporating new lighting, electrical upgrades, and plumbing fixtures. The design for this project is scheduled for 2011 with construction in 2012.
2011 – 400,000
2012 – 4,000,000
Justification = This project is important because the MMB is an old inefficient building. City maintenance is having an increasingly difficult time adequately maintaining this building with regard to the HVAC system and electrical loads. The City will see significant energy savings once the project is implemented. In addition, employee comfort will increase and maintenance issues will decrease.
I think this goes with the grand vision for hotel/public market/train station. That gets us up to $6,380,000.
General Building Improvements
In 2011, this funding will be used to maintain the numerous buildings that Facilities Management maintains. Project may include the following: A/C compressor replacement for City Channel, heat pumps and A/C at South Health, A/C Fleet Services. In addition, various plumbing, roof and tuck pointing repairs at various buildings will need to be made. Additional funding in the account is available to deal with unanticipated capital repairs that may need to be made throughout the year such as emergency repairs to electrical, HVAC and roof issues. This project also includes funding for engineering studies.
2011 – 2016 = 200,000/yr.
Justification = This project allows Facilities Management to work on projects throughout the year that are smaller in nature and may; at the time the budget is put together, not anticipated. This also provides funding for emergency repairs to electrical, HVAC and roof issues.
Renewable Energy
This project is to implement solar electric, solar thermal system, or other solar technologies at various locations throughout the City. Sites under consideration for 2011, include Streets West, Fire Stations #11 and #7, Police West , Warner Park, and the Central Library. The systems will produce electrical energy, domestic hot water or heat for the buildings or the electrical grid. The City of Madison is a US Department of Energy Solar America City, one of only 25 in the country. Solar America Cities showcase renewable energy projects. $100,000 is a reauthorization from 2010.
2011 – 210,000
2012 – 115,000
2013 – 120,000
2014 – 125,000
2015 – 130,000
2016 – 135,000
Justification = This project is important to continue the City’s success in becoming a national leader in sustainability and renewable energy.
Engineering Office Remodel
This project is to replace the ceiling and lighting in Engineering first floor CCB. In addition, this project would remodel the front counter space to make it ADA compliant, install carpeting throughout, relocate or remove existing walls to improve efficiency, and create a break room for engineering employees. This project will include moving Engineering Annex (Room 107A) to room 112 and 118, which currently house County Supervisors and County Clerk. This will provide Engineering with the needed extra square footage and also move Engineering Annex closer to the Main Office. The Sanitary Sewer Utility will be paying for 27% and the Stormwater Utility will be paying for 24% of this project, leaving only 49% funded through General Obligation Debt. (These expenses are noted in Sanitary and Stormwater Utilities Budgets). This project is a reauthorization from 2010.
2011 – 372,400
Justification = Replacing the ceiling and lighting would improve the energy efficiency of the lighting and providing an ADA complaint front counter would allow all residents equal access.
City County Building Improvements
This project represents the City’s share of renovations scheduled for the City-County Building. The major items include renovation of the HVAC and electrical systems. Projects in 2011 include retro-commissioning of the CCB and related capital improvements, installing lighting occupancy sensors, garage air handling unit, solar hot water system, and chilled water distribution system replacement.
2011 – 350,000
2012 – 2016 = 150,000/yr
Justification = This funding is payment to the County for improvements to the CCB.
Fire Department – Major HVAC
In 2009, a assessment of the Fire Administration and Fire Station #1 was conducted and in 2010 an aging air conditioner was replaced. The results of this study show that Fire Administration and Fire Station #1 need to have the building windows replaced and insulation added to the building. In addition, the roof needs to be replaced. These are projects that would be done in 2011. In addition, design fees are funded in 2011 to engineer the new heating system. Once the investments are made to the envelope of the building, the heating system can be replaced and sized properly for the newly sealed building. This budget is not the same as the 2010 CIP, but the total funding is the same over the next two years. 2015 Facilities Management will upgrade the Emergency Generator and Electrical Circuits
2011 – 630,000
2012 – 1,100,000
2015 – 95,000
Justification = As previously stated, Fire Administration and Fire Station #1 is one of the most inefficient buildings that the city operates. This project will begin to tackle this problem and will realize operating savings through increased energy efficiency.
HR Remodel
This project is to remodeled the reception area, replace two offices that were previously eliminated , add a large conference room , and provide for a testing room . The remodel will replace ceiling, lighting, temporary walls, and HVAC throughout the main office and will also install card access reader system to the office.
2011 – 187,700
Justification = The remodeled reception area will increase security as currently the HR office is completely open and unrestricted at anytime during office hours. The remodel also adds a large conference room, this kind of space is continually becoming more difficult to find in the CCB. The remodel will also add efficiency as it includes a testing room that is more conveniently located for applicants and staff.
I thought this failed last year, surprised to see it back.
City Assessor Office Remodel
This project has two phases. The first phase is to complete the ceiling replacement that was started by the County several years ago. The second phase of the project is to create a break room in the back of the Assessor’s office space to provide better accommodations for employees.
2011 – 215,000
2012 – 50,000
Justification = The ceiling in the Assessor’s office is partially replaced the majority of this project is to finish that work. This project is also to create a better break room for city employees.
New Office Space
This project is to replace office space for City employees in the MMB. The assumptions for this project are that we build new 70,000 sq/ft building and that the cost of construction is $250 sq/ft. This also assumes that there are no land costs as the City and the Parking Utility may be able to swap land. This also assumes building some parking for City Fleet.
The design for this project is scheduled for 2012 with construction beginning in 2013
2012 – 1,750,000
2013 – 17,500,000
Justification = If the MMB is converted to a hotel, there will be a need to build new office space for City staff.
oooooooo, ouch! That gets us up to $25,630,000
ARRA Energy Efficiency Grants
ARRA – Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant Program. Projects include lighting retrofits at the following locations: Olbrich Gardens, Fleet Services, Summit Parks Maintenance Facility, Fire Station 6, 7, 8, 10, and Traffic Engineering – Sayles Street. This funding will also fund LED Street Lights and a waste study as part of a project to study anaerobic digesters for food waste. This funding is reauthorized from 2010.
2011 – 564,450
Justification = Lighting retrofits are one of the fastest most cost effective projects that can be done to save energy.
New and Back Up AC for IT Servers
The air conditioning units for the City of Madison data center located in the GA level of CCB are over 23 years old and at the end of their designed life. These units provide air conditioning for mission critical data, voice, storage and video computer systems that are used by every city agency including first responders like police, fire and public health. Currently there is no backup AC system for the data center other than to open the doors to the data center and blow building air into the room using standard fans. Sustainable Engineering Group was hired to review the load needs and provide energy modeling in order to make a recommendation that will provide new air conditioning at the most cost-effective and energy efficient possible. These recommendations included: use of teamed units that will use approximately half the energy of the existing system; an air exchange system that will re-use heat generated by the electronic equipment in the data center; and a cooling system that will take advantage of the cold Wisconsin winter to assist in cooling the room.
2011 – 459,000
Justification = The air conditioning units for the City of Madison data center located in the GA level of CCB are over 23 years old and at the end of their designed life. These units provide air conditioning for mission critical data, voice, storage and video computer systems that are used by every city agency including first responders like police, fire and public health. Currently there is no backup AC system for the data center other than to open the doors to the data center and blow building air into the room using standard fans.
Funny, at the committee looking at city channel, they were bragging about their wonderful facilities and said they should merge because their facilities were far superior. I guess not.
Building and Building Improvements
It is important that Monona Terrace be maintained at a first-class level to continue and enhance revenue streams. The success of our facility is based on its marketability and its competitiveness both regionally and nationally. Monona Terrace must maintain and enhance the physical building, current fixtures and services in order to continue to meet and service the expectations of clients and guests. The building improvement request meets these expectations. A sample of the items that are planned for 2011 include Technology upgrade, Fire and Life Safety upgrade, airwall resurfacing and light fixture replacement.
2011 – 520,000
2012 – 375,000
2013 – 660,000
2014 – 1,030,000
2015 – 225,000
2016 – 285,000
Justification = The success of the facility is based upon its marketability and its competitiveness both regionally and nationally. To meet these goals, Monona Terrace must maintain and enhance current fixtures and services so we can continue to meet and service the expectations of clients and guests. The maintenance and enhancement of the facility has a direct impact on the short and long-term financial success of Monona Terrace.
Machinery and Other Equipment
The Machinery and Other Equipment projects are required to meet customer needs and maintain our marketabililty. Expenditures in this category include scheduled replacement of service and building equipment , including furniture, staging equipment, maintenance equipment, and kitchen equipment.
Building and Building Improvements
2011 – 75,000
2015 – 80,000
Equipment & Vehicles
2012 – 555,000
2013 – 325,000
2014 – 157,000
2016 – 190,000
Justification = It is important that Monona Terrace continually update its fixtures and equipment to remain competitive in the marketplace. Considering the prominence and visibility this facility has, aesthetic expectations from the meeting industry and the community are high. The expectation is that the Frank Lloyd Wright motif will be maintained and enhanced with state-of-the-art equipment and services. It is further expected that equipment will be in working order
Bike Path Resurface
This project is set to begin in 2012. The project is to fund the resurfacing of the bike path where it has been damaged over time by the proximity to the lake among other reasons.
2012 – 500,000
Justification = The bike path connects riders going from east to west and west to east in the city of Madison. The number of riders in Madison continues to grow year after year. The bike path is a critical transportation component to those using it for work and play. The maintenance of this mode of transportation affects clients of Monona Terrace and citizens of Madison. If the bike path is not maintained, ridership could diminish and visitors would complain.
cip12 – State St/Capitol Square
Side Streets – Carroll/Dayton
This project involves the reconstruction of a portion of Carroll Street between State and Dayton Streets, and Dayton Street between State and Carroll Streets pursuant to the adopted State Street Design Project Plan. Funding in 2011 is for design fees (design work will be performed by City Engineering staff, possibly in conjunction with an outside consultant), with construction scheduled in 2012. General Obligation borrowing is TIF eligible to be paid from TID #32.
2011 – 50,000
2012 – 562,000
62,000 in 2012 comes from special assessments.
Justification = Reconstruction of the 100-600 blocks of State Street was completed in 2008. One of the important aspects of the adopted State Street Design Plan is to continue some of the design elements approximately one block on either side of State Street to create a “district” instead of just a corridor.
Sides St – Frances
This project involves the reconstruction of portions of Frances Street between University Avenue and Langdon Street pursuant to the adopted State Street Design Project Plan. Funding in 2011 is for design fees (design work will be performed by City Engineering staff, possibly in conjunction with an outside consultant), with construction scheduled in 2012. General Obligation borrowing is TIF eligible to be paid from TID # 32.
2011 – 88,500
2012 – 590,000
65,000 in 2012 comes from special assessments
Justification = Reconstruction of the 100-600 blocks of State Street was completed in 2008. One of the important aspects of the adopted State Street Design Plan is to continue some of the design elements approximately one block on either side of State Street to create a “district” instead of just a corridor
State St.: 700/800 Blocks
This project involves the reconstruction of the 700 and 800 blocks of State Street. The designs of the existing sidewalk, pavement, lighting, and street furnishings are dated. The proposed project is to reconstruct the street as necessary to update the appearance of the street. The proposed concept is to create a flexible space so as to accommodate the current and future needs. General Obligation borrowing is TIF eligible to be paid from TID #32.
2012 – 750,000
2013 – 4,900,000
344,000 in 2013 comes from special assessments
Justification = Reconstruction of the 100-600 blocks of State Street was completed in 2008. It is necessary to continue this project to this last section of the Street to provide a consistent design of this important corridor and link it with Library Mall.
Side Streets: Johnson/Henry
This project involves the reconstruction of portions of Johnson Street between Broom and Carroll Streets, and Henry Street between State and Mifflin Streets pursuant to the adopted State Street Design Project Plan. In 2014, funding sources include $200,000 in Federal funding for improvements adjacent to the Federal courthouse. General Obligation borrowing is TIF eligible to be paid from TID #32.
2013 – 248,000
2014 – 1,653,000
200,000 from Federal sources and 182,000 from special assessments in 2014
Justification = Reconstruction of the 100-600 blocks of State Street was completed in 2008. One of the important aspects of the adopted State Street Design Plan is to continue some of the design elements approximately one block on either side of State Street to create a “district” instead of just a corridor.
Gorham/Henry
This project involves the reconstruction of Gorham Street between State and Henry Streets, and Henry Street between State and Gorham Streets pursuant to the adopted State Street Design Project Plan. General Obligation borrowing is TIF eligible to be paid from TID #32.
2014 – 102,000
2015 – 683,000
75,000 from special assessments in 2015
Justification = Reconstruction of the 100-600 blocks of State Street was completed in 2008. One of the important aspects of the adopted State Street Design Plan is to continue some of the design elements approximately one block on either side of State Street to create a “district” instead of just a corridor.
These projects are all in the Edgewater TIF . .. so the more projects, the longer the TID is open, the longer the schools and county don’t get their money.
cip18 – Library
Rebuilt Central Library
This funding is for a rebuilt Central Library. In their evaluation, development, and design of the rebuilt Central Library, City staff is directed to study and consider the feasibility of including either a rooftop intensive community garden and/or a green roof. All G.O. borrowing and $4,500,000 of Other Funding is reauthorized from 2010. Private contributions of $8,000,000 are anticipated in 2011.
2011 – $27,700,500
$8,000,000 in fundraising, 4,500,000 from federal sources
Justification = Current Central Library building systems are at end of life. Building system failures and costly repairs can be expected.
Hawthorne Branch Improvements
Provide necessary upgrades and maintenance (new carpeting, painting, etc.) to the Hawthorne Branch Library, which opened in new space in the East Madison Shopping Center in August of 2000.
2011 – 75,000
Justification = Each one of our branches is on an approximate 10 year schedule to replace worn carpeting, faded and chipped paint, and other minor repairs or remodels as necessary.
New Branch: Grandview Commons
A new branch on the far east side of Madison is needed to provide library services to this rapidly growing population, and ease continued over-crowding and over-use at the Pinney Branch. The site for a proposed new branch, Grandview Commons, was donated by the Veridian Corporation to the City in 2008.
2012 – 600,000
2013 – 5,400,000
Justification = Population increases on the east side of Madison warrant the addition of a new branch. The Pinney Branch service area contains an estimated 44,000 people; we need another branch further east to provide library services to east siders.
Ashman Branch Improvements
Provide necessary upgrades and maintenance ( new carpeting, painting, etc.) to the Alicia Ashman Branch, which opened as a new branch in October of 2000. This project will also include the installation of express checkout equipment which will require changes to the circulation desk and entry areas.
2012 – 100,000
Justification = Each one of our branches is on an approximate 10 year schedule to replace worn carpeting, faded and chipped paint, and other minor repairs or remodels as necessary.
New Maintenance Vehicle
Funds for this project would purchase a new Maintenance staff vehicle, which will replace the 1998 model currently in use.
2012 – 50,000
Justification = The current vehicle was purchased in 1998, so by 2012 will be 14 years old. Mileage trends show use at 6,000 miles per year, and that will increase when the South Madison project is completed later this year. Most use is from in-town driving, which is harder on vehicles, and a new vehicle in 2012 would be expected to get better fuel mileage, which would produce less impact on the local environment. The potential to trade in the current vehicle with less mileage could also help to offset the cost of the new vehicle.
New Branch: Far Northeast Side
Current and proposed development and population growth on the far northeast side of Madison indicates a future need for a new branch library for this area. The Capital Improvement Program includes funds to purchase land in 2012.
2012 – 750,000
Justification = Population increases on the far northeast side of Madison warrant the addition of a new branch. The Hawthorne Branch is not conveniently located to serve residents as far east as East Towne Mall, and is not large enough to serve the ever-growing Hawthorne visitors; we need another branch further east to provide library services to northeast siders.
Meadowridge Branch Expansion
Expand the Meadowridge Branch or identify other opportunities for expansion in the service area, perhaps co-locating with a new community center. This expansion would provide a major increase in Internet availability; offer spaces for neighborhood meetings, group study, tutoring and small group conferences; provide spaces for educational programs for children and adults; and make room for more books and media.
2012 – 2,500,000
Justification = The current < 6,000 square foot Meadowridge Branch is inadequate to meet the needs of library users on the southwest side of Madison.
Lakeview Branch Improvements
Provide upgrades and maintenance (new carpeting, painting, etc. ) to the Lakeview Branch on the north side, which was redesigned and substantially expanded in 2003.
2014 – 75,000
Justification = Each one of our branches is on an approximate 10 year schedule to replace worn carpeting, faded and chipped paint, and other minor repairs or remodels as necessary.
New Branch: Far West Side
Current and proposed development and population growth on the far west side of Madison indicates a future need for a new branch library for this area. The Capital Improvement Program includes funds to purchase land in 2015. The CIP also includes funds for professional design services in 2016.
2015 – 1,000,000
2016 – 640,000
Justification – Population increases on the far west side of Madison warrant the addition of a new branch. The Meadowridge and Ashman Branches are not conveniently located to serve the west side’s dispersed and growing population.
Pinney Branch Improvements
Pinney’s inefficient T-12 lighting needs to be replaced with more economical lighting fixtures. The borrower services area needs to be redesigned to include express checkout machines. It will also be time to replace worn carpeting and to repaint where necessary.
2016 – 250,000
Justification – Each one of our branches is on an approximate 10 year schedule to replace worn carpeting, faded and chipped paint, and other minor repairs or remodels as necessary. The current lighting fixtures are not sustainable.
cip21 – Planning, Community and Economic Development
Downtown Plan
This project involves the development of a detailed plan for the Downtown as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. The project began in 2008 and is expected to be completed in late 2010 or early 2011. Funds may be used for costs associated with completing the planning process, such as public meetings, supplies, and printing/publishing of the final document and associated graphics. Other funding is reauthorized TIF funding from 2010, including $5,000 each from TIDs #23, 25, and 32.
2011 – $15,000
Justification = The last plan addressing the entire Downtown was Downtown 2000 (adopted in 1989). Many new issues have emerged since that time–particularly related to redevelopment/preservation pressures. A major recommendation of the Comprehensive Plan is that a new plan for Downtown be created, building on the Downtown Advisory Report prepared in 2004 that compiled the major recommendations of existing plans related to the Downtown and began to identify some of the issues that will need to be addressed in the new Downtown Plan. This new plan will also guide the creation of new zoning districts and design guidelines for the downtown during the rewrite of the City’s Zoning Code.
Municipal Art Fund
The Municipal Art Fund is a continuing program , integrating public art into public projects and the public realm. Expenditures and projects related to the commissioning and purchase of artwork are defined in the Public Art Framework and Field Guide for Madison, Wisconsin (adopted 2002). Projects include, for example: public art outside of the new Children’s Museum, Northside and University Ave. neighborhood gateway features, Central Park, Central Library, and other public art projects. Funds will be utilized for the City’s Cultural Plan and related studies to implement the Framework Plan. Ten percent of the available funds are reserved for maintenance. $40,000 of the General Obligation Debt is reauthorized from 2010.
2011 – 70,000
2012 – 30,000
2013 – 30,000
2014 – 30,000
2015 – 30,000
2016 – 30,000
Justification = The Common Council adopted the Public Art Framework and Field Guide in 2002, which outlines the expenditures of funds within this program. Pursuant to this policy direction, several projects have been committed to based on funding authorized in previous budgets.
TID 32 – Upper State St. Corridor
This TID was created to encourage commercial revitalization, building enhancement and public improvements in order to stimulate development in the 100-400 blocks of State Street. The boundaries were amended in 2008. The TID boundaries will be amended again in 2011 to extend the TID to include an area defined by E. Johnson St. on the east, James Madison Park on the north and Lake Mendota on the west. $16,000,000 is included for financial assistance for the expansion of the Edgewater Hotel and $300,000 is for Small Cap Loan funding. $8,000,000 of the General Obligation debt is reauthorized from 2010. The General Obligation borrowing is debt that is TIF-eligible. Other funding is from TID proceeds.
2011 – 8,300,000
2012 – 8,300,000
2013 – 300,000
2014 – 300,000
2015 – 300,000
2016 – 300,000
Justification – This area has a deteriorating building stock and deteriorating public improvements. The strengthening and stabilization of this essential commercial area of the City is vital to the health of the street and the neighborhood. The proposed budget incorporates rehabilitation of the areas as a continuing step in the commitment to the implementation of long-term plans to preserve our retail core, provide additional opportunities for revitalized owner-occupancy in the surrounding neighborhood of Mansion Hill, promote economic development and stimulate the expansion of the City’s economic base.
This is the 16M for the Edgewater. I guess this means they are not trying to work anything out to get started this year.
TID 36 – Capitol Gateway Corridor
This is a project to enhance economic and industrial growth within an area generally bounded by First Street, East Washington Avenue, and Blount and East Wilson Streets. Funds will be used for providing marketing and outreach efforts to assist in the retention and expansion of existing businesses, and to attract new businesses to the Capitol East District corridor. Funding for 2011 includes $250,000 for professional fees for project management, marketing and studies related to improvement projects within the District, $50,000 for early start streetscape improvements along E. Main Street, $1,600,000 for the acquisition and demolition of properties for the expansion of Central Park, $2,000,000 for the acquisition of strategic properties for redevelopment within the District and $150,000 for the business planning and pre-development expenses associated with the construction of a Sustainability Center. Funding for 2012 includes $2,000,000 for construction of the Sustainability Center.
2011 – 4,050,000
2012 – 2,300,000
2013 – 300,000
2014 – 300,000
2015 – 300,000
2016 – 300,000
Justification = This project will enhance the area’s potential to retain and expand existing businesses and attract new businesses. Areas within the city are needed for these types of activities. This will stimulate the expansion and diversification of the city’s economic base. Lack of funding in this area may result in businesses that would otherwise expand or locate in this area to be either displaced or located outside of the city.
I think this means they are trying to buy the Mautz paint site, but I’m not certain in 2012. In 2011, I’m not sure what further property they are buying, but I feel like I should know.
TID 38 – Badger / Ann / Park St.
This TID was created in 2008 as part of the revitalization of the South Park Street and Badger Road area. General goals include the elimination of blight and the stimulation of commercial and residential development. $3,000,000 was included in 2009 for acquisition, demolition and relocation costs associated with land assemblage for a Senior Housing project. 2011 will fund acquisition of two (2) more parcels on the block to provide for Phase 2 & 3 of the project. Costs associated with this project are TIF eligible.
2011 – 425,000
Justification – This project will eliminate blighting influences, stimulate desired land uses and promote housing diversification which will continue the revitalization of this area. Without this funding, the proposed housing project will not occur as proposed, and the area will continue to deteriorate.
TID 39 – Stoughton Road
This TID was created to promote economic development within an area generally bounded by South Stoughton Road, Cottage Grove Road, Interstates 39/90 and the property line between Voges Road and the Beltline. 2011 funding includes $200,000 for the promotion and maintenance of the BioAg Gateway to include: continued implementation of the marketing plan through professional consulting services, maintenance of the Bio Ag Gateway website (including the addition of BioLink information), marketing materials, staff attendance/travel expenses to conferences and meetings with prospects, property maintenance and miscellaneous development expenses. 2011 funding also includes the reauthorization of $2,049,250 from 2010 for the construction of the BioLink.
2011 – 2,249,250
2012 – 200,000
2013 – 200,000
2014 – 200,000
2015 – 200,000
2016 – 200,000
Justification = In 2008, The Hiebing Group and Vandewalle & Associates prepared a marketing strategy for the BioAg Gateway. Implementation of this strategy, including preparation of marketing materials, began in 2009. Without funding in 2011 for continued implementation of the marketing plan, staff’s ability to market the availability of City-owned property within the BioAg Gateway will be diminished. Failure to include funding for property maintenance within the BioAg Gateway will be adverse to City property maintenance standards & in the case of lighting & snow-plowing, could create a public safety concern. $2,049,250 of the requested funds is a reauthorization of the local match approved by the Common Council for BioLink. Failure to include this within the budget will put into jeopardy the City’s ability to leverage $4,500,000 of Federal EDA funds to construct this facility.
Hurry up, hurry up, hurry up . . . wait. Funny how its always an emergency to get something approved and then once approved . . . it needs to be reauthorized.
TID 40 – Northside
This TID was created in 2009 to encourage commercial revitalization, building enhancements and public improvements to stimulate economic development and eliminate blighting influences. The TID boundaries are generally defined on both sides of a corridor that runs from First St. along Sherman Ave., Northport Dr., Packers Ave. and Troy Dr. Funding for 2011 is General Obligation debt that is TIF eligible and will be used for business assistance ($500,000).
2011 – 500,000
2012 – 500,000
2013 – 500,000
2014 – 500,000
2015 – 500,000
2016 – 500,000
Justification = Failure to include this in the budget will necessitate a later budget amendment for any business assistance that is desired.
TID 41 – John Nolen
This TID will be created in 2011 to encourage commercial revitalizaton, building enhancements and public improvements to stimulate economic development and eliminate blighting influences. The TID boundaries are generally John Nolen Dr. from Proudfit St. to King St. and include the Bassett Neighborhood, Block 88 where the Madison Municpal Building is located and the Government East Parking Ramp on Block 105. Funding for 2011 is General Obligation debt that includes reauthorizaton from 2010 of $9,000,000 for a new hotel on Block 88 and $300,000 for Small Cap TIF funding. The GO borrowing is TIF-eligible.
2011 – 9,300,000
2012 – 300,000
2013 – 300,000
2014 – 300,000
2015 – 300,000
2016 – 300,000
Justification – The need for more hotel rooms for the viability of the Monona Terrace Community and Convention Center has been identified. Failure to include this funding in the budget will continue the negative impact of insufficient rooms for the MTCCC.
More TIF for hotel space . . . you knew it was coming. This brings us up to $34,630,000 for the project by the Municipal building with the hotel and public market.
CDA Red. – TID 42 – Truax / Webb-Rethke
This TID will be created in 2011 to encourage commercial revitalization, housing, building enhancements and public improvements to stimulate economic development and eliminate blighting influences. The TID boundaries will be generally Anderson Street, Milwaukee Street and Stoughton Road and include the Truax Park and Webb-Rethke CDA Housing projects. Funding for 2011 is General Obligation debt that includes $50,000 for master planning services for the Webb-Rethke and Darbo-Worthington neighborhoods. Future year funding will support redevelopment activities within the TID. The GO borrowing is TIF eligible.
2011 – 50,000
2012 – 2016 = 300,000/yr
Justification = To be competitive for HOPE VI or other HUD programs, the City will need to provide a funding match, especially for infrastructure improvements. TIF proceeds do count as a cash match and help make the City / CDA’s application more competitive.
We’re going TID crazy this year. Perhaps this TID money could replace the AHTF money that they want to borrow for 17 years.
TID 43 – Royster Clark
This TID will be created in 2011 to encourage commercial revitalization, housing, building and public improvments to stimulate economic development and eliminate blighting influences. The TID boundaries will be generally on both sides of Cottage Grove Road from Monona Drive to Stoughton Road and include the former Royster Clark site. Funding for 2011 is General Obligation debt that includes $3,400,000 for the acquisition and demo of improvements and environmental remediation of the former Royster Clark site for a mixed- use redevelopment project. “Other” $500,000 is from reauthorized BREWD funds. The GO borrowing is TIF eligible.
2011 – 3,400,000
Justification = The former Royster Clark site has a blighting influence on the neighborhood. Failure to include this funding in the budget will continue the negative impact of this property on the neighborhood which will limit the promotion of commercial and housing redevelopment in this area.
TID 44 – Wingra
This TID will be created in 2011 to encourage commercial revitalization, housing development, building enchancements and public improvements to stimulate economic development and eliminage blighting influences. The TID boundaries will be generally bounded by South Park Street, West Wingra Drive and Fish Hatchery Road and include the former Morningstar Dairy property and the Truman Olson US Army Reserve Center Funding for 2011 is General Obligation Debt that includes $300,000 for an affordable senior housing project on the former Morningstar Dairy property The GO borrowing is TIF eligible. In addition, $1.3 million is for the acquisition of the Truman Olson Army Reserve Center on S. Park Street. 2012 funding includes $440,000 for the demolition and improvements on the Truman Olson site.
2011 – 1,600,000
2012 – 440,000
Justification – The former Morningstar Dairy site has a blighting influence on the neighborhood. Failure to include this funding in the budget will continue the negative impact of this property on the neighborhood which will limit the promotion of commercial and housing redevelopment in this area.
Hmmm . . . and the property could have been purchased for $1.
CDA Red. – Truman Olson Replacement Property
In 2008 the Common Council authorized the submission of a Redevelopment Plan for the Truman Olson Army Reserve Center (“Truman Olson”) located at 1402 South Park Street from the Department of Defense. It is anticipated that the property will be made available for purchase in 2011. Funding in 2011 includes reauthorization of $225,000 for purchase of a Water Utility parcel located on Nakoosa Trail, $210,000 for geopiers, grading, environmental remediation, and related engineering and site planning work on the Nakoosa Trail property, $50,000 for planning and holding costs related to the site.
2011 – 435,000
Justification – The acquisition of the Truman Olson property by the City of Madison/Madison Community Development Authority was approved by the Common Council. Failure to allocate funding for this purchase would be contrary to the City’s desired Redevelopment Plan for the Truman Olson property.
Senior Center Building Improvements
Building improvements continue efforts to upgrade the 28year old Madison Senior Center facility. Projects for 2011 include: 1) repurposing a small game room into a social & food service area or cafe ($45,000 for coffee kiosk equipment & furniture, $85,000 for construction) and 2) completing entry improvements ($30,000) & draperies ($6,300 for first floor, $3,600 for second floor). Acoustics to be addressed with Reception Desk alterations ($10,000) and finalizing exterior entry improvements ($30,000). Architectural, interior and engineering design services will be necessary for these improvements ($15,500).
2011 – 195,400
Justification = This project continues the effort to renovate and refurbish the 28-year old Madison Senior Center. These improvements are long overdue and have been planned for several years. Renovating and refurbishing the facility make it attractive and relevant to multiple cohorts of participants.
CDA Red. – Truax Park, Wright/Anderson & Webb/Rethke Master Planning & Site Development
The Truax Park Master Plan builds upon the recommendations of Public Housing Residents, Neighbors, the Community Development Authority Board of Directors and its Long Range Planning Committee. This plan includes plans for a HOPE VI or a newer pilot program which could potentially involve $20 MILLION in federal funding and help to revitalize this eastside area. Phase 1 currently underway, will renovate 71 existing public housing units. Phase 2 will examine a redevelopment strategy in and around these 3 eastside Public Housing sites. There will be no net loss of public housing. No residents will be displaced as the project will be phased, allowing for the resident transfers to rehabbed or new units. This project will build upon the institutional strengths of Madison Area Technical College and the East Madison Community Center and development opportunities in this east side area.
2011 – 300,000
2012 – 1,000,000
Justification – The vision is to provide long term affordable housing and enhance the quality of life of the existing residents and attract new residents. It is anticipated that a HOPE VI grant application or a newer pilot program could provide up to $20 million dollars in federal funding. This City investment could leverage substantial federal funding. Public Housing across the nation is in transition. Mixed-income neighborhoods with new financial structuring, requiring less dependence on dwindling Federal HUD funding is taking place. This redevelopment will be the first of 3 major redevelopment efforts in transforming the City’s Public Housing.
If they get this, do they need the Affordable Housing Trust Fund Money? Why not give them the $1M now?
Neighborhood Centers
This project provides authorization for new funding for non-profit agencies to acquire, construct, or renovate facilities that will serve as public resources and generate positive neighborhood effects in those neighborhoods that address the Mayor’s goals. Funding in 2011 and 2012 includes construction costs. Planning for a Southwest Neighborhood Center would begin in 2011, with construction costs for a Bridge Lake Pointe Waunona Neighborhood Center in 2012 and 2013. All funds would act as the City’s match, pending final construction estimates and private / capital efforts to move each Center forward.
2011 – 500,000
2012 – 800,000
2013 – 400,000
Interesting . . .
TID 37 – Union Corners
0
No sign of movement. Not. Good.
TIF 10%
0
This is money that should be going for affordable housing, of course, they never include it in the budget.
CDA Redev. – TID 29 Allied Terrace
0
CDA Redev. – Villager
In 2011, funds will be used to refinance approximately $7.1 million in New Markets tax credit that was used to purchase the property in 2004 and $600,000 for facade improvements to the north building to match the Atruim exterior as part of an expanded office use on this site.
2011 – 7,700,000
Justification – This project continues the significant investment by the CDA and City to create the neighborhood catalyst for revitalization. Completion of these elements will bring teh property into CDA ownership and complete the last major facade element for the project.
Refinance New Market Tax Credits?
Public Market
This project provides a deferred loan for acquisition, construction, renovation, and other related development costs for a public market to serve Madison and promote the use of local produce and products as part of an economic development strategy. 2011 funding is for architectural / engineering design services. 2012 funding is for a portion of the capital costs for the Market.
2011 – 1,000,000
2012 – 1,000,000
Justification = The Madison Public Market has been mentioned in the Mayor’s “Healthy Cities Initiative”. The Madison Public Market will not only support local producers, but help promote and support local economic development efforts, too.
Hmmmm, Up to 36,630,000 for the area by the train station.
Microfiche Conversion
A one-time charge for mass conversion of microfiche documents to digital images. These records are used to determine the legality of properties and include records such as Building Permits, Mechanical Permits, Enforcement Actions, Conditional Uses, Variances, Site Plans, and other Building Inspection, Planning and Zoning documents.
2011 – 135,100
Justification – The current employee has been converting the documents since 2001 and is currently on the letter “G”. The microfiche is used on a daily basis and is deteriorating, requiring maintenance. Some slides are going missing. The scanned documents will be electonically stored in Docfinity and will be available for citizen access. In the current state, customers can only access the records electronically through the letter “F”. The microfiche reader/printer is nearing the end of its useful life and replacement bids are in excess of $8,000. Currently, the machine has power surge issues, causing us to have to replace the bulb frequently. Making this investment now will provide better customer service and reduce long-term Division operating costs.
Preliminary Planning
This is a fund to conduct studies for proposed and potential projects in advance of specific budgeting. Study examples include: feasibility, market, blight, design, and hazardous materials. The fund is also used to advertise property and to cost-apply staff time for project work. Time spent preparing for sales, TIDs, leases of City property, and redevelopment is also billed to this account. Funding is from GO borrowing, occurring after a project is funded or a sale or rental occurs.
2011 – 2016 135,000/yr
Justification – Due to the Department’s development work, an account to fund studies during the development stage of a project is necessary. Prior to a permanent account being created, a substantial investment of time and money is expended to determine if the projects are feasible. Once a project is approved by the Council, charges are directed to the individual capital account. Surplus land sales are also expensive and time consuming. Sale costs are charged to this fund and, following the sale, are deducted from the sale receipts. This account is critical for advance development work. Without this funding, the delays would increase the cost, or opportunities to effect future developments that will provide significant return to the City may be lost.
Land Banking
This project provides funding to purchase and stabilize developable parcels of land. Priority will be given to parcels for which a development plan exists or special area plan has been approved, but no development is forthcoming due to overall economic conditions or the financial condition of the developer, thereby making the parcels available at a below-market price. Funds used for this purpose will be reimbursed through subsequent sale or ground lease of the property as part of the redevelopment or plan implementation process. The City will sell or transfer at market price any parcels purchased by the City with these funds. Upon sale by the City, these parcels are expected to remain taxable. All transactions shall be approved by the Board of Estimates and Common Council. The Department of Planning and Community and Economic Development will use implementation guidelines that have been developed for the use of these funds.
2011 – 5,000,000
Justification – In the current financial market, the ability of the City to purchase, hold, prepare and subdivide large redevelopment parcels into smaller developable parcels will be necessary to facilitate implementation of adopted Neighborhood Plans and the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Failure to include these Land Banking funds within the budget will diminish the City’s ability to purchase these properties, and in turn, realize the redevelopment potential of the properties under consideration.
Seems like they are TIF’ing most of the projects people were eyeing. Wonder where these funds are planned to be spent? Year one . . . no plans in site, why reauthorize?
S.E. Madison Transportation Study
South East Madison is home to nearly 300-acres of platted parcels targeted for employment and industrial development. These parcels are currently not directly served with access to the Interstate and Beltline Highway. $100,000 is included in 2011 to fund a transportation study of S.E. Madison to determine what, if any, improvements can be made to the access to this transportation system. $50,000 is included in 2012 to study implementation of the Hwy. 51 / Broadway / Femrite intersection improvements recommended in the 2008 Stoughton Road Revitalization Project Plan.
2011 – 100,000
2012 – 50,000
Justification – S.E. Madison presents a tremendous opportunity to increase employment within Madison, especially through industrial development. Improved access to the Interstate and Beltline Hwy. would enhance the ability of the City to attract businesses to this part of the community. These studies are the first step toward making these impovements. Failure to include this item within the budget will likely mean that the status quo is maintained.
This all looks routine, I didn’t have time to pull in all the explanations, just the numbers for how much would be spent 2011 – 2016.
Hardware and Software Upgrades $1,600,000 $1,840,000 $2,100,000 $2,415,000 $2,750,000 $3,065,000
Network Security 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000 250,000 260,000
Enterprise GIS 70,000 80,000 85,000 90,000 95,000 100,000
Enterprise Financial System 3,950,000 0 0 0 0 0
Mobile Computing Laptops 200,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
Purchased Software Enhancements 250,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 400,000
Expand Fiber and Wireless Network 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
Printer Replacement 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Enterprise Collaboration System 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 0
Legislative System 0 500,000 0 0 0 0
Tax System Changes 40,000 0 0 0 0 0
Property Assessment System 200,000 0 0 0 0 0
Heh . . . that’s a little deceptive!
This all looks routine, I didn’t have time to pull in all the explanations, just the numbers for how much would be spent 2011 – 2016.
Microbiology Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (QPCR) Equipment $70,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Public Health Offices at Villager 0 0 0 0 0 20,000
Computer Replacement 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Remodel CCB 5th floor for Offices 0 200,000 0 0 0 0
Integrated Software System 200,000 0 0 0 0 0
Remodeling Office Space at the Public Health East Washington Office 0 40,000 0 0 40,000 0
Remodeling Public Health Office Space on International Lane 0 0 20,000 0 0 0
cip50 – Metro
Transit Coaches
Replacement of Transit Coaches (14 buses in 2011, 14 buses in 2012, 15 buses each in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016). All buses will meet both EPA emissions standards and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
2011 – $5,110,000
2012 – $5,110,000
2013 – $5,529,750
2014 – $5,585,048
2015 – $5,640,898
2016 – $5,697,307
About $4M each year comes from federal sources.
Justification – This project is Metro’s “number one priority”. It impacts customer service, service costs and the environment. Newer buses generally have fewer breakdowns, which leads to better on-time performance. In addition, they provide a cleaner, more pleasant ride, and are more fuel efficient than older vehicles.
Building Remodeling Projects
Reauthorization of one project not yet completed and funding for new projects in 2011. The reauthorization project is for repaving the parking lot ($150,000). The 2011 budget includes the following projects: a remodeling continquency for emergencies ($40,000), painting and refurbishing one transfer point ($45,000), and constructing a Fuel Island roof ($20,000). Eighty percent of these projects will be funded with Federal funds and the local share will come from General Obligation Debt.
2011 – 255,000
2012 – 865,000
2013 – 335,000
2014 – 290,000
2015 – 290,000
2016 – 340,000
Justification – These projects are needed to ensure a clean, safe & secure work environment.
Transit System Upgrades
Acquire equipment and software to improve operations. Applications will include security cameras for paratransit buses ($76,000), electronic display signs ($28,500), Integrated Voice Response software module ($200,000), Drivermate software module ($200,000), and Automated Runcutting software module ($200,000). These projects will make the operations of the transit system more efficient and convenient for passengers and provide the transit system with accurate data, as well as providing a safe environment for our employees and passengers.
Eighty percent of the cost of these projects will be funded by Federal funds and the local share will come from general obligation debt.
2011 – 704,500
2012 – 1,898,785
2013 – 219,073
2014 – 4,579,364
2015 – 79,657
2016 – 1,279,954
Justification – Metro’s investment in security cameras has shown cameras serve as an effective tool in deterring inappropriate behavior and provide an additional level of security for passengers and drivers. The requested funding will allow Metro to retrofit all Paratransit buses with security cameras. Metro needs to follow the lead of major American cities that are fully outfitting their buses with cameras to investigate accidents, passenger incidents, graffiti and vandalism issues, and violence on Metro buses. The existing cameras have provided immensely valuable information in effectively addressing these areas and helping Metro meet its commitment of providing the safest possible public transit services in our community. In addition, Metro must continue to update and expand the current Infrastructure to ensure data accuracy, compatibility with other systems and city agencies, and create additional efficiencies in services.
Building Expansion/Remodeling
This project is for the first stage of the engineering and design costs (architect) phase of Metro’s project to Expand and Remodel the Transit Admin. and Operations Offices, Maintenance and Bus Storage Facility. This is necessary for the building expansion and improvements as determined by the Building Needs Analysis Study that was completed in 2005 and the commencement of the construction project. It is expected that the Design will be completed in 2012 and the Construction phase of the entire project to be budgeted in 2013-2016.
Eighty percent of the cost of these projects will be funded by Federal funds and the local share will come from general obligation debt.
2011 – 100,000
2012 – 2,500,000
2013 – 4,800,000
2014 – 31,100,000
2015 – 20,500,000
2016 – 16,100,000
Justification – Metro completed the Space Needs Analysis study in 2005. The next phase is developing design plans (architect) and engineering. This is a safety and security issue since Metro is housing 71 buses beyond what the facility was designed to house. The new design will incorporate traffic flow and maintenance area enhancements that will better utilize available space. In addition, the new facility will allow for adequate space for Metro personnel to operate within the same facility, eliminating the need to lease additional office space. Metro’s ability to be a true Regional Transit Authority in the Madison/Dane County area is constrained by the current facility. Planning ahead 10 to 20 years, Metro should anticipate increased public transportation needs due to oil prices, energy scarcity, global warming, and other factors. In order for Metro to meet these needs, a larger facility is required. The Building Expansion/Remodel project are also in response to recommendations made by the Ad-Hoc Committee.
Even if the city only pays 20% that’s a huge chunk of change! Over $70 MILLION. I sure hope the RTA helps pay for it!
Streets – I’ll come back to this in part II.
Streets – I’ll come back to this in part II.
Streets – I’ll come back to this in part II.
I’ll come back to this in part II.
This all looks routine, I didn’t have time to pull in all the explanations, just the numbers for how much would be spent 2011 – 2016.
Replace Equipment $4,263,700 $4,310,700 $5,053,200 $8,297,200 $3,635,000 $5,181,000
Facility Upgrade 180,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
Fire Equipment Replacement 1,386,800 1,182,400 1,252,700 1,230,400 280,000 1,709,043
GPS/AVL 120,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Fuel Dispenser Upgrade 36,000 0 0 0 0 0
cip57 – Traffic Engineering
– I’ll come back to this in part II
cip58
Parking Garage Repairs
This is a continuing program of major repairs encompassing entire garage sections, including the replacement of concrete and steel reinforcement and the addition of a waterproof membrane system to the wearing surface. Most years, an investigation of conditions is performed at one or more ramps. In 2008, we began a decade-long rehabilitation of electrical (inc. lighting), mechanical and plumbing systems to bring our parking garages up to code and improve the facilities. In 2011, studies and design will be done at all facilities ($51K). Repairs and rehab will be done at Gov East, State St Campus, Cap Sq North, Overture and State St Campus ($614K ttl). Garage Office remodeling projects: $10K/year.
2011 – $675,000
2012 – $842,000
2013 – $359,000
2014 – $196,000
2015 – $280,000
2016 – $244,000
Justification – Parking is a necessary component supporting the downtown. The maintenance of parking structures increases productivity by keeping more spaces available for use. The failure to adequately maintain these structures would negatively impact downtown businesses and decrease the revenue available to the Parking Utility for future operating and capital expenditures. Inadequate maintenance will also increase maintenance costs in the future, because deterioration increases exponentially if not addressed in the early stages.
MMB/GE Parking Garage
This project envisions a 1200-stall garage to be built on the current MMB site with up to 600 – 820 stalls financed by the Parking Utility. It may be built in conjunction with a train station, hotel, city market, bike station, retail and extend under Pinckney St into the current Gov East site. Planning will take place in 2010-11 costing $1.2M (reauth), with construction in 2011/13 costing $22.4M($27320 est. cost/space x 820, inc. land value). Phasing allows for the demolition of Gov East garage as early as 2012-13. The Gov East Garage is 52 years old and is nearing the end of its useful life. Maintenance costs are becoming increasingly high. It is estimated that demolition costs for Gov East garage would be $950K. The project assumes a mixed-use project on the current Gov East and MMB site.
2011 – 13,200,000
2012 – 12,552,000
Justification – Replacement parking for the area must be constructed before the Gov East garage is demolished. The new parking will serve the needs of former Gov East customers, as well as Monona Terrace, a hotel, city agencies and other area businesses. It will act as part of the parking support for the new train station. Failure to replace this facility on a timely schedule will result In increasingly high maintenance costs. It has been maintained for many years under the assumption that it would be replaced around 2014.
Well folks, there you have it, $62,352,000 for the area around the train station including the hotel and the cheapest part of the project so far . . . the public market.
Brayton Lot
The Brayton surface parking lot is bordered by East Washington, Butler, Hancock and Main Streets. It contains 154 surface parking stalls and typically operates at 90% occupancy at peak. This is the highest occupancy in our system. A portion of the parcel is owned by the State of Wisconsin. This parcel will not be developed soon and must be maintained to a higher standard. This project envisions replacing the islands and repaving the lot. The islands and paved surfaces are deteriorating and will become a trip hazard. New islands will also prevent parkers from driving over them to avoid paying the parking fee. The Parking Utility has attempted to buy the State’s portion of this parcel and these discussions continue. Reauthorization from 2010 ($150,000).
2011 – 180,000
Justification – The public parking in this quadrant of the Square is critically important to area businesses. The Brayton Lot facility typically operates over 90% occupancy at peak and can fill up. Maintaining a surface lot close to the square with no height limit supports the business community and other activities where standard structures cannot. Not including this item in the budget will expose the Utility to increased hazards to our customers and the related liability issues. Large holes have developed have developed on the surface due to poor soil conditions below grade.
Parking Revenue Equipment
This project funds the purchase and modification of parking revenue equipment. This investment will increase the efficiency and productivity of the Utility and creates customer-friendly options (credit card payments). With increasing meter rates the amount of coinage necessary to pay for parking has become burdensome. Improvements ($150,000) to the Zeag system in 2011 will continue our progress towards a more automated system. Fifteen multi-space pay-by-space units were purchased in 2010. Seventy more units will be purchased in 2011 ($567K) and 15 more in 2012 ($122K). A space marking system is also being purchased ($73K in 2011 and $20K in 2012). These purchases will keep us competitive in today’s parking climate. Reauthorization from 2010 ($690,000).
2011 – 790,000
2012 – 292,000
2013 – 2016 100,000/yr
Justification – The replacement of parking revenue equipment is necessary about every 10 years in order to take advantage of technological changes and, thus, increase the productivity of facilities and employees. Current equipment would incur an increasing number of malfunctions as time goes on, and our customers would be subjected to delays. Multi-space meters allow for payment by credit/debit cards. As parking rates increase, fewer customers have an adequate amount of change to provide for sufficient time to complete their task and parking citations are more likely creating a poor downtown experience.
Video Cameras
Safety and security was the #1 concern of our customers in a recent survey. The number of incidents in our garages such as “smash and grab” type events have increased in recent years. Video surveillance will act as a deterrant to some individuals and will assist law enforcement in capturing and prosecuting criminals. Cameras will also help us safeguard our revenue stream by monitoring entrances and exits to detect gate crashers. Cameras will also allow us to view exit stations in real time to assist customers at unattended facilities. Customers and employees will likely feel safer with video surveillance in progress. A demo camera operation was started at Overture garage in 2010 to better determine equipment needs, capabilities and costs.
2011 – 2015 25,000/yr
Justification – Safety and security is our customer’s #1 concern. We must address this concern to stay competitive in today’s market. Failure to provide adequate safety and security will result in reduced occupancy and a diminished capacity to maintain a financially self-sufficient enterprise.
Wow. I think their number one concern is getting rid of the parking monitors . . . and that won’t help the safety issue. If you want to know more see savemadisonjobs.com.
Shop Office Expansion
The DOT office facility at 1120 Sayle is in need of vertical expansion to accommodate additional employees. With the unknown future of the DOT MMB office facilities, it is imperative that we start planning now for new facilities. The Parking Utility office facilities in particular are already at capacity as we search for new space for support functions for the planned multi-space meter installations. Planning for this expansion will take place in 2012 with construction in later years. Traffic Engineering plans a joint expansion project at the Sayle St shop for their communications section ($50K in TE planning for 2012).
2012 – 50,000
Justification – Additional space is needed for the revenue and maintenance functions. Both are housed at the Sayle Street facility. If additional space is not provided, maintenance on revenue equipment will be impaired or delayed, causing our customers inconvenience and costing the Utility funds needed to keep our infrastructure in good repair. Revenue auditing and processing has become more complex and personnnel intensive as technology brings needed improvements to the Parking Utility. Failure to keep up with those needs will cost the Utility money and needed parking out of service.
Shop Bldg/grounds repair
This is a continuing program for various building improvements and repair projects at the Traffic Engineering and Parking Utility field operations facility at 1120 Sayle Street. City Engineering has recommended various projects to upgrade and maintain the building. In 2011 we will replace windows to increase the building’s energy efficiency ($13,100) and resurface the parking lot ($32,500). In 2012 we will upgrade the HVAC system including controls ($41,250). The shop parking lot has not been resurfaced in over 15 years and is in a state of disrepair.
2011 – 45,600
2012 – 41,250
2013 – 2016 12,000/yr
Justification – Energy efficiency is a City-wide goal. We must continue to improve our energy efficiency to reduce our carbon footprint and improve our atmosphere. Old pavement can cause excessive wear and damage to city vehicles and sediment runoff to nearby surface waters.
I’ll come back to this in part II.
I’ll come back to this in part II.
I’ll come back to this in part II.
I’ll come back to this in part II.
I’ll come back to this in part II.
I’ll come back to this in part II.
Ok, sorry I didn’t get it all done, they finally released the information yesterday afternoon . . . and that was as fast as I could work . . . next up, operating budget and part II capital budget. The files are there for the items I skipped if you want to look yourself.
Thank you Brenda. Looking forward to the rest of the info.
This is really fantastic! Knowledge is power and your work here makes me feel like I’m understanding things about my government that I’d otherwise never know. This is true journalism.
Do you have a way to donate to this website? I’d like to do what I can to make sure you’re able to continue and expand this work. I assume others out there would like to do the same to re-pay you for your efforts. Thanks again for the “lookout!”