Media

Professor Undercoffler starts it off, talking about his report . .. .

I really don't know what to call these things anymore, but this is the Schmidt/Bidar-Sielaff and now Rummel proposal for tonight, revised.

These are the only issues unless someone registers on another item or an alder decides they have something to add . . .

You must decide on Overture tonight, not two weeks from now.

Tonight! 5:30! This is a slight re-write of an action alert on how you can help. I can hardly wait to see which...

i.e. the Schmidt/Bidar-Sielaff version that labor is supporting. I bolded the highlights for you. Since I'm throwing so much at you this morning....

I think the city attorney concluded that most of the amendments were policy, not legal issues. There are a few notes and comments, but almost all seem ok by him.

Seriously, isn't our housing affordable here in Madison? Take a look . . .

Here are the amendments again, with the responses from MCAD/201 on the Overture proposals. Of course, the council will have to first discuss if they are amending the alternate, or the alternate, alternate. And likely, few of these will pass with the responses from MCAD/201. I'm beginning to think they won't have 11 votes for anything. And we'll be doing a repeat on the 14th.

They like the Mark Clear/Lauren Cnare version, with some amendments. They don't like the labor supported Chris Schmidt/Shiva Bidar-Sielaff version. This is getting confusing . . .

With a little more than a month before Scott Walker takes office and a series of public rallies behind us, the momentum is building...

Um, this has nothing to do with the Overture.